Adding a Stack Builder to Setapp's Pricing Page — Turning 'It Depends' Into a Number

by The Mida Team

Hypothesis: "It depends" is true, but it isn't an answer — it's a question the visitor has to go solve themselves, with no calculator and no login to Setapp's own account panel. Building the comparison for them, using their actual apps and real prices, turns a page that requires math into one that just states the result.

Brand of the Week

Setapp pricing page — control vs variant

Setapp sells access to a curated library of Mac and iOS apps through a membership: $14.99/mo for Mac, $18.99/mo for Mac + iOS (its "Popular choice" tier), or $22.99/mo for Power User (4 Macs + 4 iOS devices) — all with a 7-day trial and up to 40% off on annual billing. The whole pitch rests on membership beating buying apps one by one, and that's exactly the comparison the page never does the math on.

The challenge

We took a peek at Setapp's pricing page, and three things caught our attention.

The pricing page never answers the buyer's core question. Setapp's own FAQ asks it directly — "What's cheaper: buying apps individually or getting the Setapp Membership?" — and answers with "It depends on how many apps you need." That answer sits collapsed inside an FAQ at the bottom of the page.

Reviews confirm the value is conditional, and skeptics have no way to do the math themselves. "When you use enough apps, it is really worth its price," says one; "What is worth $33 a month there? Seems like a bunch of basic utilities," says another. Nobody's shown the arithmetic that would settle it either way.

The "just one app" path pushes shoppers toward comparing prices with individual developers instead of keeping them on Setapp. Single-app prices exist, but only on each app's own page — never next to the membership plans. The "Need just one app?" banner sends visitors straight to the Marketplace with no price shown at all, and nowhere does the page mention that single apps run Mac only.

So what would we A/B test?

Control: Setapp's pricing page as it stands — three membership tiers, a "Need just one app?" banner routing to the Marketplace with no price attached, and the real cost comparison locked inside a collapsed FAQ answer ("it depends").

Variant (built in MidaGX): Replace the banner with an interactive stack builder. Visitors pick the apps they'd actually use — popular picks are apps Setapp also sells individually — and get a side-by-side table: buying those apps one by one vs. the membership, broken out by cost per month, first-year cost, devices covered, and how many other apps come bundled in. A plan toggle (Mac / Mac + iOS / Power User, defaulting to Mac for a like-for-like comparison) updates the verdict live: "Membership saves you $X/mo" when singles cost more, "Same price, 302 apps instead of 2" near breakeven, or "For $X/mo more, get all 302 apps" when singles are cheaper — plus an iOS upsell prompt on the Mac plan ("Need iPhone and iPad too? Mac + iOS adds them for $4/mo") and a flag on membership-only apps. The single-app path stays available as a secondary link under the trial CTA, so Setapp keeps the visitor instead of sending them to a developer's own checkout. The FAQ's "what's cheaper" answer links straight back to the builder.

Our hypothesis

"It depends" is true, but it isn't an answer — it's a question the visitor has to go solve themselves, with no calculator and no login to Setapp's own account panel. Building the comparison for them, using their actual apps and real prices, turns a page that requires math into one that just states the result.

The CRO principle underneath

This is the same proximity principle behind meeting doubt where it lives: an answer that exists somewhere on the site — a collapsed FAQ, an individual app's price page — only works if it shows up at the exact moment the visitor is deciding. Setapp already had every number this fix needed; it just never put them next to each other.

Want to run a test like this on your own site? Get started with Mida for free — now available even if you don't have an account with Mida.

Related patterns

This is the third brand-of-the-week teardown in the series. The first two: Adding a Comparison Table to SuperSaaS's Pricing Page and Adding a Review Filter to Bokksu's Product Page.